Home > Tipití > Vol. 16 > Iss. 2 (2018-2019)
Keywords
killing, Amazonia, food taboos, vegetarianism, animal personhood, morality
Abstract
Originally written for a conference on meat attended by farmers, anthropologists, people involved in cultural affairs, and other members of the public, and seeking to avoid emphasis on cultural difference, this paper explores common ground between Euro-American and Amerindian ambivalence about meat consumption. Meat-eating raises two shared concerns: an intuitive recognition of the resemblances between humans and animals and an uncomfortable awareness that human life often depends on the death and destruction of other living beings. I suggest that, behind some obvious cultural differences, Amazonian shamanic and ritual procedures aimed at the de-subjectification of meat share points in common with various Euro-American procedures that seek to disguise or render invisible the harsher realities of meat eating.
Recommended Citation
Hugh-Jones, Stephen P.
(2019).
"Good Reasons or Bad Conscience? Or Why Some Indian Peoples of Amazonia Are Ambivalent about Eating Meat",
Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America:
Vol. 16:
Iss.
2, Article 7, 102-119.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol16/iss2/7
Included in
Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, Folklore Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Human Geography Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Linguistic Anthropology Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Work, Economy and Organizations Commons