indigenous histories, memory, the future, Waorani, Ecuador
In this article I consider the impact of Peter Gow’s writing on indigenous histories as a key area of research on Amazonia. Building on his study of kinship as history on the Bajo Urubamba (1991) he presented a regional perspective on the dynamic social categories by which Amazonian people understand their relations with various “others.” Focusing on indigenous agency and modes of thought, Gow challenged certain lines of historical thinking that dominated anthropology at the time. I explore how his ethnographic approach to history has influenced a generation of regional scholarship, including my own work on memory and social transformation among Waorani people in Amazonian Ecuador. I look specifically at how Gow’s approach can help contextualize expressions of historical continuity and difference in indigenous politics. In contrast to relatively static views of history in a global politics of recognition, the categories of difference and their transformation he described remain central to how some Amazonian people relate the past to their hopes for the future. Understanding this process requires Gow’s sensitivity to radically different ideas of the past, as well as attention to the multiple histories that Amazonian people engage with today.
"Civilized Elders and Isolated Ancestors: The Multiple Histories of Contemporary Amazonia",
Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America:
1, Article 4.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol19/iss1/4
Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, Folklore Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Human Geography Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Linguistic Anthropology Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Work, Economy and Organizations Commons